Доклад о состоянии здравохрания в мире -
ISBN 978-924-456373-1
Скачать (прямая ссылка):
98. Gill JM, Mainous AGI, Nsereko M. The effect of continuity of care on emergency department use. Archives of Family Medicine, 2000, 9:333-338.
99. Rothwell P. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation, Lancet, 2005, 365:176-186.
100. Kravitz RL, Duan N, Braslow J. Evidence-based medicine, heterogeneity of treatment effects, and the trouble with averages. The Milbank Quarterly, 2004, 82:661-687.
101. Stiell A. et al. Prevalence of information gaps in the emergency department and the effect on patient outcomes. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2003, 169:1023-1028.
102. Smith PC et al. Missing clinical information during primary care visits. JAMA, 2005, 293:565-571.
103. Elder NC, Vonder Meulen MB, Cassedy A. The identification of medical errors by family physicians during outpatient visits. Annals of Family Medicine, 2004, 2:125-129.
104. Elwyn G. Safety from numbers: identifying drug related morbidity using electronic records in primary care. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2004, 13:170-171.
105. Open Medical Records System (OpenMRS) [online database]. Cape Town, South African Medical Research Council, 2008 (http://openmrs.org/wiki/OpenMRS, accessed 29 July 2008).
106. Husler J, Peters T. Evaluation of the On Cue Compliance Service pilot: testing the use of SMS reminders in the treatment of tuberculosis in Cape Town, South Africa. Prepared for the City of Cape Town Health Directorate and the International Development Research Councii (IDRC). Cape Town, Bridges Organization, 2005.
107. Smith-Rohrberg Maru D et al. Poor follow-up rates at a self-pay northern Indian tertiary AIDS clinic. International Journal for Equity in Health, 2007, 6:14.
108. Busse R, Schlette S, eds. Focus on prevention, health and aging, and health professions. Gutersloh, Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2007 (Health policy developments 7/8).
109. James Pfeiffer International. NGOs and primary health care in Mozambique: the need for a new model of collaboration. Social Science and Medicine, 2003, 56:725-738.
110. Jaffre Y, Olivier de Sardan J-P. Une medecine inhospitaiiere. Les difficiies relations entre soignants et soignes dans cinq capitaies d’Afrique de i’Ouest. Paris, Karthala,
2003.
111. Naithani S, Gulliford M, Morgan M. Patients’ perceptions and experiences of “continuity of care” in diabetes. Health Expectations, 2006, 9:118-129.
112. Schoenbaum SC. The medical home: a practical way to improve care and cut costs. Medscape Journal of Medicine, 2007, 9:28.
113. Beach MC. Are physicians’ attitudes of respect accurately perceived by patients and associated with more positive communication behaviors? Patient Education and Counselling, 2006, 62:347-354 (Epub 2006 Jul 21).
114. Farmer JE et al. Comprehensive primary care for children with special health care needs in rural areas. Pediatrics, 2005, 116:649-656.
115. Pongsupap Y, Van Lerberghe W. Patient experience with self-styled family practices and conventional primary care in Thailand. Asia Pacific Family Medicine Journal, 2006,
Vol 5.
116. Weiss LJ, Blustein J. Faithful patients: the effect of long term physician-patient relationships on the costs and use of health care by older Americans. American Journal of Public Health, 1996, 86:1742-1747.
117. Rosenblatt RL et al. The generalist role of specialty physicians: is there a hidden system of primary care? JAMA,1998, 279:1364-1370.
118. Kempe A et al. Quality of care and use of the medical home in a state-funded capitated primary care plan for low-income children. Pediatrics, 2000, 105:1020-1028.
119. Raddish MS et al. Continuity of care: is it cost effective? American Journal of Managed Care, 1999, 5:727-734.
120. De Maeseneer JM et al. Provider continuity in family medicine: does it make a difference for total health care costs? Annals of Family Medicine, 2003, 1:131-133.
121. Saver B. Financing and organization findings brief. Academy for Research and Health Care Policy, 2002, 5:1-2.
122. Tudiver F, Herbert C, Goel V. Why don’t family physicians follow clinical practice guidelines for cancer screening? Canadian Medical Association Journal, 1998, 159:797-798.
123. Oxman AD et al. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 1995, 153:1423-1431.
88
91
66
Глава 3. Первичная медико-санитарная помощь: в центре внимания - интересы людей
124. Freeman G, Hjortdahl P. What future for continuity of care in general practice? British Medical Journal, 1997, 314: 1870-1873.
125. Miller MR et al. Parental preferences for primary and specialty care collaboration in the management of teenagers with congenital heart disease. Pediatrics, 2000, 106:264-269.
126. Mainous AG III, Gill JM. The importance of continuity of care in the likelihood of future hospitalization: is site of care equivalent to a primary clinician? American Journal of Public Health, 1998, 88:1539-1541.
