Имплантанция зубов хируругические аспектов - Робустова Т.Г.
ISBN 5-225-04712-2
Скачать (прямая ссылка):
59a Drago A. Implant restorations: A step by step. — Implant Innovations Inc. — Texas, 1997. - P. 219.
60. Eckert S.E., Laney W.R. Patient evaluation and prosthodontic treatment planning for osseointegrated implants // Dent. Clin. North Amer. — 1989. — Vol. 33. - P. 599-618.
61. Ellis E. The nature of vertical maxillary deformities: Implications for surgical intervention // J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. — 1985. - Vol. 43. - P. 756.
62. Engelman М., Sorensen J., Moy P. Optimum placement of osseointegrated implants // J. Prosthct. Dent. — 1988. — Vol. 59. — P. 467.
63. Fallschusser G. Zahnaurztliche implan-tologic. — Berlin: Quintessenz, 1986. —
S. 203.
64. Fernandes R.J., Azarbal М., Ismail Y.H. A cephalometric tomographic technique to visualize the buccolingual and vertical dimensions of the mandible I I J. Pros-thet. Dent. - 1987. - Vol. 58. - P. 466-470.
65. Gabriel A. C. Some anatomical features of the mandible // J. Anat. — 1958. — Vol. 92. - P. 580.
66. Geering A., Kundert M. Total- und Hy-bridprothetik / 2. Aufl. Farbatlanten der Zahnmedizin. — Bd. 2. — Stuttgart: Thieme, 1992. — S. 81.
67. Goaz P.W., White S.C. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. — St Louis: Mosby, 1992. - 316 p.
68. Graf H. Bmxism // Dent. Clin. N. Amer. - 1969. - Vol. 13. - P. 659-665.
69. Grondahl A'., Ekestubbe A., Grondahl H.G. Technical considerations for intraoral radiography in postoperative examination I I Nobel Biocare Global Forum. — 1996. — Vol. 10(3). - P 10-11.
70. Gruber H., Solar P., Ulm C. Anatomie und atrophiebedingte Ver(ndcrungen der Kicfcrknochen. Endossale Implantatc in der oralen Chirurgie. Ed. G. Watzek — Berlin: Quintessenz, 1993. — S. 29—60.
71. Harle F. Atlas dcr proprothetischen Op-erationen. — Munchen: Hanser, 1989. — P. 212.
72. Habets L., Bras J., Borgmeyer-Hoelen A.M. et al. Mandibular atrophy and metabolic bone loss, endocrinology, radiology and histomorphomeiry // J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. — 1988. — Vol. 17. — P. 208.
73. Harris W., Heaney R. Skeletal renewal and metabolic bone disease // New Engl. J. - 1969. - Vol. 280. - P. 193-303.
74. Hendrick R.T., Dove S.R., Peters D.D. et al. Radiographic determination of canal length: direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography // J. Endo-dont. - 1994 - Vol. 20(7). - P. 320-326.
75. Hoffman K. Preoperative Considerations Maxilla Endoosseus Implants for Maxillofacial Reconstruction. — Philadelphia — London: Saunders Co., 1995. — P. 103—
113.
76. Jeffcoat М., Jeffcoat R.L., Reddy M.S., Berland L. Planning interactive implant treatment with 3D computed tomography//J. Amer. Dent. Assoc. — 1991. — Vol. 122. - P 40-44
77. Jensen J., Nock D. Inferior alveolar nerve repositioning in conjunction with placement of osseointegrated implants: a case
report // Oral Surg — 1987. — Vol. 63. — P. 263.
78. Jensen O. Site classification for the os-seointegrated implant Ц J. Prosthet. Dent. - 1989. - Vol. 61. - P. 228-234.
79. Kondell P., Nordenram A., Landl H. Titanium implants in the treatment of eden-tulousness: influence of patient’s age on prognosis // Gerodontics. — 1988. — Vol. 4. - P. 280.
80. Kennedy E. Partially denture construction. — Brooklyn — N.Y., 1928. — 124 p.
81. Kent J., Misiek D. Biomaterials for cranial, facial, mandibular and TMJ reconstruction // Oral and maxillofacial trauma / Eds. R. Fonseca, R. Walker. — Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1991. — P. 781— 1026.
82. Kiesselbach J.E., Chamberlain J.G. Clinical and anatomic observations on the relationship of the lingual nerve to the mandibular third molar region // J Oral Maxillofac. Surg. — 1984. — Vol. 42. — P. 565.
83. Kircos L.T. Implant imaging in perspective with a focus on interactive computed tomography and electronic surgery // Int. Cong. Oral Implant. — 1995, March 15-16.
84. Kircos L.T. Magnetic resonance imaging of the mandible utilizing a double scout techniques for preprosthetic imaging I I J. Magnetic Res. Med. — 1993. — Vol. W. - P. 24-30.
85. Kircos LT. Quantitative implant imaging with a focus on interactive computed tomography: successful implants cases / Are they possible? For how long? — Lo-ma Linda University, 1994.
86. Klinge B., Petersson A., Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: Comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computer tomography // Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Impl. — 1989. — Vol. 4. - P. 327-332.
87. Kraut R.A. Selecting the precise implant site // J. Amer. Dent. Assoc. — 1991. " Vol. 122. - P 59-60.
88. Kraut R.A. Utilization of 3D/dentaI software for precise implant site selection: Clinical reports // Impl. Dent. — 1992. " Vol. I. - P. 134.
89. Kraut R.A. Radiologic Planing for dental Implants. Endoosseus Implant for Maxil* lofactal Reconstruction. — Philadel phia—London: W.B. Sanders, 1995. " P. 113-134
90. Laney W. Selecting edentulous patients for tissue integrated prostheses // Int. J oral maxillofac. implants. — 1986. — Vol. 1. - P 131.
